on to our home industry，” and that i was “opposed to a tariff for protection merely， and not for revenue.”
the power “to lay and collect taxes， duties， imposts， and excises” was an indispensable one to be conferred on the federal government， which without it would possess no means of providing for its own support. in executing this power by levying a tariff of duties for the support of government， the raising of revenue should be the object and protection the incident. to reverse this principle and make protection the object and revenue the incident would be to inflict manifest injustice upon all other than the protected interests. in levying duties for revenue it is doubtless proper to make such discriminations within the revenue principle as will afford incidental protection to our home interests. within the revenue limit there is a discretion to discriminate； beyond that limit the rightful exercise of the power is not conceded. the incidental protection afforded to our home interests by discriminations within the revenue range it is believed will be ample. in making discriminations all our home interests should as far as practicable be equally protected. the largest portion of our people are agriculturists. others are employed in manufactures， commerce， navigation， and the mechanic arts. they are all engaged in their respective pursuits and their joint labors constitute the national or home industry. to tax one branch of this home industry for the benefit of anot
<< 上一页 [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] 下一页